Ford Fiesta 1.6 Metal review
by David Finlay (19 December 2011)

Shortly after I parked the Ford Fiesta Metal outside my mother's house, a concerned neighbour came round to tell me that the tyres were flat. Actually, they had the right amount of air in them. What had confused the interfering old busybody (the neighbour, not my mother) was that they were very low-profile, and yes, from two storeys up, if you were looking for an excuse to poke your nose into someone else's business, they might have looked a bit flat.
Those tyres are part of a package which make the Metal look significantly different from most other Fiestas. Other contibutory items include 17" Panther Black five-spoke alloy wheels, side skirts, a tailgate spoiler, lowered suspension, twin exhaust tailpipes and - in the case of the test car - the £470 option of Midnight Sky metallic paint.
Not visible from the outside are the alloy pedals or the uprating of the 1.6-litre petrol engine from its usual 118bhp to a more robust 132bhp. This makes it, at least for now, the most powerful unit in the range by some margin (the second most powerful being the same thing in its unmodified form), and gives the Metal a range-leading 0-62mph time of 8.7 seconds - not blindingly fast by any means, but reasonably perky.
You do have to rev the engine quite hard to get much out of it, and that's not great because the fuel economy is nothing to brag about at the best of times. The official figure is 47.9mpg but I could only just get within 10mpg of that, even during a test in which spirited motoring was frequently out of the question because of icy road conditions. (The close-ratio five-speed gearbox, which keeps the revs above 3000rpm at 70mph in top, doesn't help economy either.) Still, this demonstrated that even without pushing hard you can enjoy the sound of the exhaust note, which is a good deal sportier than in other Fiestas.
So the Metal definitely looks the part, and to some extent goes and sounds it. You might be interested in investing in what remains of the original 1000-strong production run if you wanted something with the general appearance of a junior hot hatch.
On the other hand, nobody who knows what a junior hot hatch really is will give the Metal a second thought. Those tyres are very grippy, and react quickly to steering inputs, but the suspension, which feels hardly any more sports-oriented than it does on a standard Fiesta, can't keep up with them.
The Metal is therefore not nearly as much fun as it looks like it's going to be on corners, and on damp and not ideally surfaced roads even a brisk overtaking manoeuvre can be surprisingly troublesome as you wonder exactly which was the car wants to go.
If you like the style and aren't much interested in driving, this is fair enough. For me, though, the Metal . . . let's see, what cliché would work here . . . oh, yes . . . for me, the Metal writes a cheque that it can't cash. It simply isn't the car it says it is.






Comments
We have a 1.6 Fiesta with the
We have a 1.6 Fiesta with the standard engine 118bhp and the fuel consumption is great it never falls below mid 40s and on a long run will do 50mpg and that is keeping up to 60mph on A roads and 70mph on motorways so why could you only get mid 30s don,t you know how to drive ?
Perhaps the real fault with this car in your eyes is that it doesn't have a BMW or VW badge then you would be saying it was the best car on the market !
You are talking about a car
You are talking about a car with a different power output, among other things which could affect fuel economy, so it does not make sense to compare the two. Also, if you look at our BMW or VW (or anything else) reviews you'll see that we do not rate a car simply on its badge. We are not that stupid. You must be thinking of someone else.
Should also add that the
Should also add that the Metal's gear ratios don't favour fuel economy. A sentence to that effect has been added to the article.
I own a S1600 the
I own a S1600 the predecessors of the metal, and I can kind of agree with the average fuel consumption figures being low, however to criticize the handling and chassis or suspension is confusing to say the least, unless Ford have completely changed the set up from the S1600. The fiesta has class leading handling and is a hoot to drive, so my point? If you want a fun small hatch you can't beat the Fiesta, in my opinion.
Thanks for that, but again,
Thanks for that, but again, different cars. As mentioned in the article, there's a clash between the tyres and suspension of the Metal which we don't like at all. But try one for yourself - you might disagree!
I have owned my Metal since
I have owned my Metal since December after trading in my 20 month old mark 7 Zetec-S. The difference between the two is immense. The suspension is tighter, the ride smoother, and the extra bhp there when you need it, I always found with my Zetec S that it lacked in power but the Metal is great. I will definately be holding on to this one!
why oh why when ford's build
why oh why when ford's build a short run vehicle like the metal , why dont they badge the vehicle as a metal .
getting fed up with people askin me why my zetec s has twin pipes .
or is there somewhere i can purchase such badge .
tho it is a great car to drive , handles lovely
Add new comment