| Road Test Jeep Commander 3.0 CRD Limited |
||
|
By Popular Demand
The result is a car which does most of what the current Grand Cherokee does, except that it looks tougher and has two more seats. Jeep's marketing department will be emphasising the differences more than the similarities, of course, and will be portraying the Commander as a down-and-dirty workhorse, at least in comparison with the more lifestyle-oriented Grand Cherokee. And the funny thing about that is that, of the two, Jeep claims that the Grand Cherokee is actually slightly better off-road. Not that there's much in it. The Commander has not had to be made much longer than the Grand in order to accomodate the extra seats - there's just 37mm difference, all of it behind the rear wheels - but that's enough to make the Commander fractionally less wieldy over the rough stuff. So a Jeep person told me, anyway. On paper, the Commander has a slight advantage; the two cars have identical departure angles of 27 degrees, but the Commander's 34.6 degree approach and 21.2 degree breakover angles are slightly better, and rear axle ground clearance is superior by a more significant 38mm. But this is little more than hair-splitting. The Commander is far better off-road than you need it to be. It shares with the Grand Cherokee the Quadra Drive II 4x4 system which would require several paragraphs to explain but fortunately involves practically no brainpower on the part of the driver. Simply switch the transmission into low-ratio mode (into neutral, pull small chrome lever, job done) and all the electronic trickery engages itself automatically.
Quadra Drive II allows various impossible things to happen. If, for example, three of the Commander's wheels are operating in zero-traction conditions (such as spinning in gloopy mud, or scrabbling against a moss-covered underwater rock, or even hanging in mid-air), the fourth can be called on to drive the car out of trouble.
|










